What’s the catch? Nothing we could corroborate against this app.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 1.9.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.9.2, updated 2026-09-29.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.9.1, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 1.9.2 · 2026-09-29
• Ul improvements and minor bug fixes.
What the analysis found
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Just use the website, app is trash — Every single time you open the app, you get bombarded with ads for premium that you can’t get rid of until after a certain amount of time, delaying the whole process of just being able to use the app…
Ad Feature Won’t Work!! — I loved this app, but now I can’t seem to watch an ad to enable certain features, like creating a spreadsheet from Excel, which is one of the primary reasons I kept using this app! Very disappointed…
Tons of ads, payment needed for basic features — You need to pay to refresh for responses ☠️ or watch an ad every time you want to refresh.
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
No I don’t want to buy your plan — Being constantly asked every time I open the app if I want to buy their paid plan is a great way to annoy the user and to ensure that I never spend money on it
App is so annoying and constantly shoves the subscription down ur throat — Every single time i open the app they show an unskipable “pay for our premium” which is so annoying The save button takes way too long for it to apply and…
Pro upgrade — It is useful, like a quiz to ask for birthday present ideas, but half of the app is locked until you upgrade to pro. I told my brother that every time it asks me to upgrade, I push my rating down half a star starting from 5 ⭐️
Paywall blocks the basics
Make us pay for features that used to be free and now won’t even auto save — DON’T MAKE IT A BUTTON IF I HAVE TO PAY TO CLICK
Monayyy — I’m not gonna pay for everything it should include that it costs money on the app!
It’s Mediocre — Yeah it works but you can’t open responses for a amount of time and you have to pay for other features it’s definitely basic and has no perks
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.