Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 1,129 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 2026.39.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2026.39.0, updated 2026-10-05.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2026.38.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2026.38.0.0, updated 2026-10-05.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
this product has been completely enshittified. I have been a pain user for 10 years or more, and now they're forcing me to watch ads (as a paid user!). even worse the ads are interrupting the game. they seem to be trying to have them take…
the app function is pretty solid, but the price is ridiculous. now to add insult to injury we get ads are now being displayed for the premium subscribers. I'm paying to watch my kids games not get bombarded with sales ads. and in response…
what's up with all these freaking commercials, I pay to use this space (a lot of money) and you get a lot of commercials while my grandkids was at bat. I couldn't tell where the pitch was , if it was a pop-up or a strike out. but by golly…
Paywall blocks the basics
Terrible, very expensive, wast of money — It is terrible. You have to pay so much money just a live stream something or even look at the stats or even look at the play by plays. You can’t do anything about without paying. There’s no point…
Greedy — So not only do we have to pay 15 a month we also have to watch ads Super greedy to change from a free model with ads so that parents now have to pay a ridiculous amount of money to watch their kids play and then additionally you…
plans — i shouldn’t have to pay to see the most basic of things on this app
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.