Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 483 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 2.4.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.4.0, updated 2026-05-22.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
I don't mind the limited features, but I hate the pop ups that appear constantly during my playthrough telling me to either wait 45 secs or watch an ad or pay for the premium access if you people to enjoy the game that don't have money…
Absolutely terrible. Everytime you open the app there an AD (When this one doesn't load, you're just stuck in the loading screen for 1 whole minute for no reason at all), afterwards you get a pop up for premium subscription, when you open…
i didn't auto save and away popup there upgrade to buy
Aggressive ad load
No longer opens. I try to open the app and I just get a loading screen now, can't even get to a menu or even see an ad and it was constant ads when it did work. When it was working the ads would pop up mid game and there was always the…
repeating what a lot of other low ratings have said: the app crashes and then you lose all save data, the ads can make cause the game to reset - deleting everything since your last save state, there are many, many ads, sometimes multiple…
App interface is filled with so many ads that actually starting a game is a headache. The button layout in landscape mode covers up areas of the screen. App can't access the download folder by default, and there doesn't seem to be a way…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.