Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 491 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 4.795.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.795.2, updated 2026-09-11.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
Been playing this game for a few months now and I have to say that this game has gotten boring. The graphics are nice not great. The game takes very little skill to play, but the most frustrating part of the game is when you play against…
I gave this pay to win garbage 3 stars at first for the fun mechanics this game has but now after reaching the final champions arena I wish I could give this 0 or even better -10 stars. It went from pay to win to one of the worst pay to…
When there's a significant power gap between two teams, you should already know how the game will play out. It's extremely difficult to win the ball from stronger opponents, their goalkeeper becomes almost impossible to score against…
Aggressive ad load
The network issue is not sorted. However, there are still a few minor bugs. And mainly nowadays addings ads to every single thing is so frustrating. Even for the prized you have won by completing tasks. You have a watch ads. so I hope the…
The game is obviously doing poorly. It's all bots until you play the champions arena. On top of that, they have sneaked in mandatory ads. In addition, the watch and be rewarded ads crash a huge proportion of the time. Mage will respond…
game was very addict but too much ad.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.