Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Misleading advertising
Total Scam — I saw on the ad that this app was free to use soon as I download it. The first thing it wants me to do is pay for a free trial for seven days which makes no sense or I could pay annually to use their app. There’s nothing free…
Not free — If they told the truth - I might have purchased the product . But instead it’s a purchased trial - not free. Waste of my time for false advertising of free.
Dishonest Advertising — The advertising I saw made it look like the app could measure your blood glucose by holding your finger to the camera. It doesn’t work that way. It only tracks your blood sugar based on data you enter.
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.