We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 14.7 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 14.7, updated 2026-09-26.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 5
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
Disappointing. — The only reason I bought this game was because the Kim Kardashian game got taken off the app store. Very similar games, but there are soooo. many. issues. If you don’t want to spend money on clothes for your avatar, don’t…
Money Grab — This game could be so fun - if you didn’t have to pay to do everything. I purchased 3 packs of diamonds and still can’t advance.
What happened to this game — Used to be soooo good but now it’s so glitchy and u can’t do anything after 15 mins without paying and why are some characters naked ?..
Pay to progress
Too expensive — This game is great and has potential but it’s too greedy, it’s impossible to get anywhere in the story without spending real money and even when you do it doesn’t give you a good amount of diamonds, you spend $5 and all…
My rating — I really like this game a lot, but there are a couple of flaws about it. This game always uses energy, everything I do uses energy. But also the energy doesn’t regenerate that fast it’s kind of a pain to wait for it or I need…
This game was fun, but… — I played this game for a few days and LOVED IT. It reminded me of my favorite childhood game, star girl. The bad thing about it is kind of a pay to win game. Most of the clothes aren’t cheap. They cost a lot of…
Aggressive ad load
Let me buy no ads — Love this game but the forced ads are ruining my experience playing. Recently found as a replacement for Stardom but its just genuinely not enjoyable with the forced ads. Please let me pay to remove them.
Good, but way too many ads! — Very entertaining and fun game, but there’s too many advertisements! They should have an option to purchase no ads.
Love it but… — I have been playing this game for YEARS and I LOVE it but recently I started playing again and they added forced adds that do nothing but waste time i am really sad bc I love this game and now it’s not as fun its hard to do…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Good game but needs some changes — I’m putting this at two stars so this gets attention. Don’t get me wrong I love this game truly, the drama is perfect and getting to dress your character with also being able to buy clothes is so much…
Good game — This game is really fun. I enjoyed playing. I would say that the energy runs out very fast and the items in this game is high priced, but I love all the different clothing items you can buy and the new areas you unlock the…
TERRIBLE AND NEEDS WORK — I’ve played this game for a month now and it is WAY too hard to get gems and how easy it is to accidentally spend them. Also, having to wait 5 extra minutes to have your energy refill. this game is too hard to…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Read this before downloading! — Ok, I love this game SO much but there are four problems that you should know before downloading. One: Sometimes I will accidentally click and buy something that I didn’t want to buy. Developers, please…
Not what I advertised — Would give zero stars if possible the advertisements made it look like a dress up fashion mini game and it is more of a meaningless story line plot where all you do is press speech bubbles. Really lousy #skipit
Meh, at best. — Repulsive, excessive and misleading ads, the game wasn’t even that much fun. It got boring. It’s just another “pay to play” based games where it loses the fun unless you’re willing to pay a lot of money to get stuff. I…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.