Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 11.8.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 11.8.2, updated 2026-08-05.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Ugh it was cool at first but it froze ALL THE TIME. It didnt keep up with my kids progress and she got tired of it quick. I thouvht I canceled it but i got charged for it today aftet not playing on it for almost a 6 months. Lets not even…
They make it way to difficult to cancel membership. I've reached out multiple times and can't cancel membership though the app.
This app lame and I want to cancel my subscription and y'all got me jumping through hoops to do so!!!
Trial converts to a charge
I signed up for the free trial and canceled it on time but they still charged me. No my kids didn't end up using this app.
I don't remember signing up for a free trial but I got charged and so I guess I have this app now. There are some cute little games in the app. I like that the audio tells the child exactly what to do.
Probably a great app but the advertisement is misleading. You have to purchase the app to use it. It seems like a free app as it allows you to download and create an account for free, but then you hit the paywall before you get to any…
Reports of unexpected charges
Ugh it was cool at first but it froze ALL THE TIME. It didnt keep up with my kids progress and she got tired of it quick. I thouvht I canceled it but i got charged for it today aftet not playing on it for almost a 6 months. Lets not even…
As someone else here has said they will still charge you after you try to cancel. I got a new card shortly after my initial cancellation request and even got an email telling me to update my card info. To which I told her I cancelled and…
I signed up for the free trial and canceled it on time but they still charged me. No my kids didn't end up using this app.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.