Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 467 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 1.6.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.6.5, updated 2026-09-21.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
As everyone described. 1st time using it seemed great with good interactions until I reached my daily limit on messaging. Turned it back on hours later and it let me message agin forcanother short while. Then blocked with a free trial is…
Cash Grab. This is just another fake app that just wants your money for everything. The "models" are obviously paid to chat because they stop chatting the second you stop buying. I want my money back. The false advertising of apps like…
This app needs to be looked into for fraud, false advertisement and misinformation. Lying directly for subscription and not upholding agreement. The app needs to be taken down. Thank you google for looking into it.
Paywall blocks the basics
It first starts with you setting up your profile & stuff, then you get searching. Women start quickly popping upn & messaging but all of a sudden, that's it, free trial is quickly over & you have to pay for everything. Lots of fakes. Do…
you start chatting with after 10 minutes it tells you you've got to pay for everything don't believe what they are advertising because it makes you pay for everything after about 10 minutes they only want you to download it
This app is money hungry. Everything is locked behind pay walls.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.