Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-07 from 1,180 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.36.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.36.1, updated 2026-09-30.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.36.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-07 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.36.2, updated 2026-09-25.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
I will leave this app 5 stars so my review will not go behind others, for me 3 stars are enough. I did not like that every episode I watched has no proper ending and seems incomplete. I also find it too hard to cancel my subscription…
DO NOT INSTALL. Another app that steals people money because it is very difficult to unsubscribe. on Google play it appears I canceled the vip on August 24. and still they charged me. because as they quickly reply they do not support…
Do No Download! issues with subscriptions and unauthorized payment even when I already deleted and uninstalled. kept on saying I subscribed when I clearly didn't. a hassle to unsubscribe.
Reports of unexpected charges
Do No Download! issues with subscriptions and unauthorized payment even when I already deleted and uninstalled. kept on saying I subscribed when I clearly didn't. a hassle to unsubscribe.
I’m very disappointed because I was charged for a subscription/online transaction that I did not authorize. I had already cancelled/unsubscribed from the subscription a long time ago, but I was still charged. I also checked my Google Play…
This app won't allow you to Cancel in the google app... And continue to bill me I"M GETTING DEPRESSED NO MORE DRAMA APP FOR ME..
Aggressive ad load
it was ok when I thought I could keep watching ads to unlock,even though it was annoying to do after every"episode" but ads are limited,it is nice you can earn coins though but I feel like that is limited too, and how much do you earn vs…
Good video quality but too many ads.
to much advertising
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
false advertising
paid $49.00 for a subscription I actually was able to see one show after that it logged me out and requested more money. this is false advertising as it claimed I would have access to the entire collection for two weeks! all I can say is…
False advertisement — The ads say it's free to use but you have to purchase coins or start a WEEKLY subscription...
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.