DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Infinite Painter
Infinite Studio LLC · Lifestyle

We analyzed this app across 6 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.

Nothing unfair corroborated · unauditedConfidence: High6 signal sources519 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-07
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 7.2.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-07 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 7.2.9, updated 2026-09-08.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 3

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
Measuredfrom user reviews and the app's own on-screen textartefact f105c606416f…
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
What we saw: Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Lifetime Purchase"
Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
No advertising SDKs
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact f105c606416f…
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
What we saw: No advertising or mediation SDK among the 5 SDKs detected in the package

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (1.9% of 519 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: Trial terms not stated in the app's own text
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact f105c606416f…
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
What we saw: Offers a free trial ("Your Free Trial ends today") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

States a price, or offers a one-time purchase

​Currently, this app offers amazing value for its one-time purchase price. I hope you’ll continue to develop new features like animation, as well as enhance brush realism—especially color blending and brush textures. It would also be…

5★ · Google Play · 2026-07-25

I wish I could give this app 5 stars. The brushes are the best I have ever used, the UI is absolutely gorgeous and clean, and the fact that it is a small one time payment (VERY worth it) for all of these wonderful features fills my heart…

4★ · Google Play · 2026-09-09

Great app, first time using a drawing tablet and I am enjoying it immensely😃 I also liked that it was a one time fee to get the app

5★ · Google Play · 2026-06-28

Paywall blocks the basics

It's alright. I was able to make one of the most FIRE pieces in it. But it takes a minute to get used to and the fact that almost everything is behind paywall is very annoying. I honestly wouldn't recommend it for beginner artists or…

4★ · Google Play · 2026-07-11

the app is hard to use and you shouldn't get it if you don't plan to buy anything. almost everything is locked behind a paywall. it's hard to understand and the minute you add a layer the one you were just using goes more transparent. not…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-26

Its a very great app with alot of brushes, import and export system, a good amount of fonts (like 15 or 20 idk) and i started writing a book using it. The only reason i didnt make it 5 stars is that almost every tool is behind a paywall…

4★ · Google Play · 2026-08-12

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-07 Version analyzed: 7.2.96 independent signals519 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.