Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
Boring,Not a rewarding game for free to play whatsoever. Definitely a hugely pay to win game. I'll see how it goes. I don't mind pay to win players but I'd at least like to be a little competitive or useful and this just isn't the game…
Great graphics but a bit low on optimization, and well i cannot buy the second builder because im poor, i wish if we can purchase it buying using ingame currencies, and im very amazed that this game has no ad to get things,money, etc for…
horrible game entirely pay to win, transactions are over priced, and knock off app of infinity kingdom, they use this app to recruit plays from other games, and they will do whatever it takes to not give you a refund.
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.