What’s the catch? Reports of unexpected charges — reported by 35 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 5.126.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.126.0, updated 2026-10-01.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports of unexpected charges
There is no free trial — I was charged for full year immediately though I was on free 3 day trial, they don’t give a refund.
Scam — I cancel my subscription and still charging me $119 thanks to chase flagging as a fraud.
You keep charging me even though I canceled the subscription — You charged me and will not refund my money!
Trial converts to a charge
Buyer beware — I thought I was getting a three day free trial and they still billed me $49.99 when I canceled it the same day and I don’t know how to do a complaint
Charged me for a free trial — Being charged for a free trial l just activated a day ago. Its a 3 day trial
Wish I could put negative stars — If I could put negative stars I would. I cancelled my free trial subscription on the day that it expired and they charged my card for an entire year and refuse to refund it. I will not be using this app…
Hard to cancel
Need real assistance — Cannot cancel. Support please.
Hard to cancel — Great product but hard to cancel
Scam, forced to subscribe for a year, no way to cancel and refund — Scam, forced to subscribe for a year, no way to cancel and refund
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Misleading — False advertising! The AI features are a joke.
Help — Not a content creator, now did I subscribe but yet $129.69 was taken from me on 2/7/2026, so I’m not happy and the false advertising please help
Subscription False Advertising — Horrible experience. They’ve never provided the tool I paid them for; they said they were fixing an issue and asked me To be patient; then they deleted the thread of this conversation ever taking place…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.