DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Intellecto Kids Learning Games
IntellectoKids Ltd · Education

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 410 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources410 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-04
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 4.76.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 4.76.0, updated 2026-09-22.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Reports of unexpected charges
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Surprise charges: raised by 31 distinct reviewers (7.6% of 410 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Trial converts to a charge
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
What we saw: Trial converts to a charge: raised by 13 distinct reviewers (3.2% of 410 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Reports of unexpected charges

It's a scam; don't fall for it. They charged me immediately, despite advertising a free trial. Additionally, I was charged twice. I emailed them, but their response was very unsatisfactory. Moreover, the app has poor graphics. the…

3★ · Google Play · 2025-08-29

I subscribed for a trial for my child, but canceled within 10 minutes via email (no reply received). Two days later, my credit card was charged twice on the same day. I contacted support several times, but instead of a refund I was only…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-09-20

❌️Scam-hidden charges! Signed up for a 7-day trial (€4.87 / €0.70 per day) and skipped all extra offers. Still got charged €5.99 plus another €19.99 without consent. Many users report the same. Misleading, confusing, and deceptive…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-01-04

Trial converts to a charge

It's a scam; don't fall for it. They charged me immediately, despite advertising a free trial. Additionally, I was charged twice. I emailed them, but their response was very unsatisfactory. Moreover, the app has poor graphics. the…

3★ · Google Play · 2025-08-29

Please be careful. This app advertises a free trial, but the moment I entered my PayPal information, I was charged €14.99 and €19.99 for two subscriptions, which were probably hidden or written in very small print somewhere. After…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-02-17

scaaaaaam beware they charged me twice when i clicked on the FREE trial! and then they have the audacity to tell me that i paid without noticing the amount! the app itself wasnt even interesting for my child so many better resources…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-12-24

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-04 Version analyzed: 4.76.03 independent signals410 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.