Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 1,281 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 6.1.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 6.1.0, updated 2026-09-26.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 6.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 6.1.0, updated 2026-09-23.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 6.0.0, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 6.1.0 · 2026-09-23
No release notes were provided for this version.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
DO NOT SUBSCRIBE!! One you do you will have to jump through hoops to cancel. There is no way to cancel through the app.
The only reason that I am giving this app 2 stars is because the stories are not too bad. But the price to buy coins and bonuses to watch the episodes are ridiculous and the amount of currency you need to watch an episode is outrageous. I…
Hard to cancel subscription. Avoid this app.
Reports of unexpected charges
stories repeated with different graphics over and over but no finished titles and series go months without updates. hidden charges you can't stop and they won't refund. Ai customer service that doesn't respond or fix anything.
They are behaving like scammers! Nothing is clear and visible especially they hidden subscription rules. Don't purchase any coins on their app or you will end up with a subscription. They took out ANOTHER $14.99 from my bank account 4…
don't subscribe they make it very difficult to cancel they keep charging you and then they keep giving you directions that doesn't exist and then they keep charging you and then you have to keep trying to figure out how to get them to…
Aggressive ad load
the app sucks, honestly. it gives a way to earn coins but then when you try to it's just a never-ending succession of ads after ads after ads and you never get any coins for what you've spent 15 minutes looking at. quite honestly I'm…
too much ads to get to watch episodes
have to open too many ads to just watch 1 episode, so takes long to finish the series. pathetic. better options with faster access on other apps.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Downloaded because of an advert and the 18+ had me intrigued. when I downloaded it however the scenes it showed were cropped and pixelated. Why would I want to see that? Basically false advertisements and stealing money
Ads said watch all episodes free, watched about 30 seconds of episode 11 and it required payment to continue watching. Good storyline, but FALSE ADVERTISING
Don't believe their fake ad of getting movies free for one day. They lied! I hate false Advertisement companies in reporting them
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.