Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 2,395 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 9.10.18 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 9.10.18, updated 2026-10-06.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 9.10.13 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 9.10.13, updated 2026-09-28.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
good but too many ads
Constant ads in my feeds to signup but then doesn’t honor signup promo — As the title says. 24/7 ads on my feed and I finally signed up when I saw a good signup promo. However, the bonus did not process and there is no support, just ai…
Constant ads — After deleting the app and blocking them on tik tok, there are still ads for this app and it’s gotten so annoying. It makes me want to use it less
Reports of unexpected charges
SCAM ALERT!!!!!!! DO NOT DOWNLOAD !!!!!! they pick and choose who they want to win a bet or the outcome of a bet no fair betting about it pretty much stole my money and didn't want to fix the issue when confronted tried to give me the ole…
It was a good experience all the way up until they intentionally stole my money and sent it to some random card that I didn't even plug into the system.. and afterwards they shut me completely down.. very unprofessional
Confused — Starting off, I wanna say congrats on the opening of this app it has given mean many oppurtious to make money but… recently I’ve lost a couple few bucks I would not trust this app it Is a scam and is being used to take money…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.