What’s the catch? Hard to cancel — 2 independent sources agree, backed by user reviews and the app's own on-screen text.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
App Store
This analysis describes version 18.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 18.0.0, updated 2026-08-03.
Google Play
This analysis describes version app 18.0.10.147101 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version VARY, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 2
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Fairly dodgy. Just sent me the auto renew notice. last year they didn't even do that. the support link on the email doesn't work. there's no way to cancel and it doesn't tell you how, or have any links to do so. the browser extension asks…
Too many steps, pain in butt to setup and can't cancel payment.
There's no way to cancel your subscription without emailing them. I have been using them for years and got sick of the poor android functionality.
Price keeps rising
2026: This year they wanted more than $90. Moved out of Keeper after 12 yrs. See ya. 2025: Price increase from $59.99 to $84.99 for the family plan. No warning. No easy way to manage your account. Just a big, unpleasant surprise. No…
34% price increase! i have used this our application for over ten years. i rely on it to keep 300 accounts safe and organized. With everything rising in cost, I understand an occasional small increase. but I am being hit left and right…
I would be lost without this app. The customer service is excellent, very responsive and helpful. Highly recommended. Update 10/1/2026 : Cost is doubling to £34, I shall be uninstalling and cancelling. What a price hike and what a shame
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
originally okay now can't do anything. I could add and edit almost anything without issues, and only was getting a pop-up to buy the full app when first opening it. the new update won't allow me to add, edit or delete any of my passwords…
Bloated and money grabbing. The app will keep on giving messages asking to subscribe for add ons. Its standard is equivalent to the free version of guite a few competitors with the costliest subscription plan. I will recommend everyone to…
Scam Pop up subscriptions tricking user to subscribe — Scamming type subscriptions like breach watch , made like a function part of the app. Trick user to subscribe, and cannot cancel and refund. Other functions are okay.
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 9 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.