Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 1,690 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 26.09.28 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 26.10.05, updated 2026-10-06.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 26.09.28, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 26.10.05 · 2026-10-06
Go on new missions with the PJ Masks! Join a midnight chase, restore a toy factory, and rescue HQ. Save the day with Catboy, Owlette, and Gekko!
Google Play
This analysis describes version 26.09.28 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 26.09.28, updated 2026-09-29.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
This game doesn't let me play and I need a free Trial to pay With money Everything is locked and they even copyrighted other shows Wait they gave credits.
would've gave fun because my 3 yr old loves is but she gets so frustrated every thing is locked, may be a reward system or ads for unlocking? I am a single parent and can't pay to unlock some of the great things you offer a little girls…
why do games like this always require extra money monthly rather than people being able to pay once and get on with their lives every single thing is locked until you pay or get a trial period
Aggressive ad load
What — This app is an absolute letdown it is pay to play. (Btw ITS A KIDS GAME) ads pop up every 5 seconds and you have to pay just to play a game,
Are you kidding me? — Once I had to play this app, so many ads popped up I had to delete this app and I had to purchase it again and in so many ads popped up I had to delete it. Do not purchase this app!
Or maybe 🤔 you just suck cause you hate us!!! — Too many ads add too scary for my kids my kids had nightmares last night You also need to pay 🗞️🗞️you should not get this game. This would get a zero star actually. ⭐️
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Use caution — This app was advertised as having a free 7 day trial but charged my account a full year (~$85) and denied a refund when I noticed immediately :(
Not good — You have to pay to use this app it’s false advertising
Nothing is free. Useless — This game seemed fun on the adds for my younger brother but as soon as we downloaded it and tried to play it all of the experiences were locked and could only be unlocked by paying for the app. Why would you…
Pay to progress
stupid pay to win app. — KIDDOPIA IS SLAPPING LOCK ICONS ONTO MY FAVRIOTE KIDDOPIA GAMES IM TIRED OF THAT
i miss old kiddopia😢😢 — why is it pay to win 😡
Pay to win — You literally cannot do a single thing unless you pay like 12 monthly or 70 some yearly.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.