Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Misleading advertising
Horrible, bait and switch pricing within the app — Within the app they offer a link that they promised that is $.99 for the first month when you click it it is there $11.99. The Chat bot said no to 99¢, "you've got a tease me down to…
NOT FREE — I found Kimi in an advertisement claiming the app was free. It performs two prompts and then tries to charge me? Don’t use this app. False advertising. It’s a scam.
🚫First AI that Lies, False Advertises itself & even Admits it 🤣🗑️ — I’ll just start with some quotes from the conversation where I didn’t ask you to do anything just yet I was just describing an idea and I’ll stop there so you can just…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.