Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 890 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.31.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.31.2, updated 2026-09-25.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.31.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.31.2, updated 2026-10-02.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
I absolutely loved this game. Currently on Level 1259. But the ads are getting ridiculous!! Way too long and way too much!! Especially when u are stuck on a level and want to keep trying, the ads that last 30 -45sec are WAY TOO MUCH!. At…
does that thing where it offers to double your reward for watching an ad and then plays an ad even if you say no edit: I don't see the point that. I'm not against watching ads for rewards but if I say no and one plays anyway I immediately…
Played this game quite a bit to relax and had a great time, but the latest update made it unplayable. Ads now play every time you fail a level. The advanced levels are hard and require a lot of trial and error, so the forced ad time is…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Enjoyable game. This has lives which run out when you fail levels and ridiculously expensive coin packs. The levels get hard so you need to spend coins to play. But there are a few different features like little races and the power ups…
Decent game. The hard puzzles use up hearts and it's too long to recharge so eventually I just stopped playing the game for something else I could play without stopping.
genuinely one of the worst games I've ever played, run out of lives? have fun wasting time spamming the ad button just for it to give you a black screen ornplay am ad and give you nothing. memorized the color patterns? that doesnt matter.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
disappointing it's not like the ads. I liked the idea of the pictures. but it's exactly like another game I'm currently playing except it's thread instead of balls. also disliking the comments about it getting harder and harder which is…
nothing like the ad. would love the game the ad is for.
false advertisement, i downloaded this game expecting a completely different game, ads are very miss leading
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.