We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 3.25.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.25.0, updated 2026-09-27.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
This will turn into quizlet & not in a good way — I’ve loved this app & discovered it more when it was lowkey. Now that I’ve returned since school has started. You have to pay for SO MUCH. It’s to the point where I’m wondering if I should…
An extremely disappointing sell-out — I had used quizlet for several years before going onto Knowt, but I stopped using it once the website stopped allowing unlimited learn modes. I chose to start using Knowt because it advertised itself…
amazing! — I downloaded the app thinking it would be like the other study apps that are full of ads and you have to buy everything, but instead it was completely free (besides premium which gets rid of Ads completely and lets you use the…
Paywall blocks the basics
free until it wasn’t — Knowt what happened to free features for students worldwide?? I was using the ap practice features and it was working great until a second ago and now they’re all locked behind a paywall. I can’t do any of my ap…
Great Until it Wasnt — I was using the mcqs feature, until an error cane up saying it wasn't available. A few days later, it kept the mcqs behind a paywall. I went to customer support, which was unhelpful and did not solve any of the…
No longer free — I remember getting this app because I seen an ad saying that this is the free version Quizlet, this was a few months ago. Yes the app was better than Quizlet because it was more affordable and you didn’t have to pay for…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.