We scanned 345 user reviews and found no recurring complaint patterns. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reviewers report clear pricing
a lovely camera app, but not so lovely pricing model — i’ve tried many camera apps over the years and this one has been a staple for over a year now even on the free tier. i’d like to upgrade to pro to unlock all the features but i just…
Love this app except for one thing — I wish it was a one time payment instead of a subscription. Hope the developers can positively consider.
Nice but — Nice app, i live the possibility of Leica filters esp BW for an iphone. How a subscription model for the casual photographer is a barrier. Esp with other apps like indigo Pi catching up for free. Hope this becomes a one time…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.