We scanned 400 user reviews and found no recurring complaint patterns. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reviewers report clear pricing
what apps should be! no monthly subscription. no in app purchases. Just a good product. heck for this id donate money for them to keep working on it. this app needs guilds and chats and a global item market. because buying something from…
I don't usually leave reviews but I gave them 5 stars because 1. ONE TIME purchase — subscriptions prevent me from using apps idc how good of an app it is 2. requires a bit of tinkering but it has helped with my ADHD A LOT because of how…
I like this a lot. There's plenty of features that let me gameify things as much or as little as I want, and there's no in-app purchases that encourage me to cheat. Well done, devs! Thank you for your hard work!
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.