Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
Paid subscription — First I was like, cool finally a app that helps locals farmers. Just to see you have to pay to use the app. What a waste, deleting the app again.
This app is not free — Not free at all. Nor is there a free tier. Apps like this should not charge to better people’s health. Why do hospitals charge to park? It’s the same thing. Would be nice if I could use a free tier and give somewhat…
Subscription fee — Got this app because I want to live a healthier life and find healthier options local and support local farms and yet you have to pay for a subscription just to use the app at all, it’s quite unfortunate that you have…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.