We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 3.18.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.18.0, updated 2026-09-03.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Doesn’t work — I used to use this app no problem, but now every time I use it and remove the background, when I go to save it, it doesn’t save it as it’s supposed to be. Also, too many ads now.
Subscription?? Really?? — This was the best app ever! Why would you give me a limit of 3 erasers per day?? Are the ridiculous amount of ads in the app not enough for you? I will be deleting this useless app
the ads are so bad now. use a different app. please. i'm begging. — this app does a decent job at removing backgrounds, but it has so many ads now to the point i'm uninstalling it. it used to not be like this. why do i have to watch an ad…
Users describe the free version as usable
BEST APP EVER! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ — I have been using this app SINCE 2019 and I have NEVER gone back! 😍 This app has helped me so much from things like projects, to editing and although the app has changed over the years (with things like…
So shocked that this app is free! — Love this app. Only occasional ads. No watermark. Easy use. I use it to remove the background of items to add to my notes. Seamless process. I don’t review apps very often , but I just genuinely love a…
SO HELPFUL & AWESOME — I was looking forever trying to find a app where I can erase little details in my photos but no app was good enough. Most of them I had to pay free trial and had a limit of how much photos I can edit without paying…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.