Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 418 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 2.86.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.87.0, updated 2026-09-28.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 2.86.0, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 2.87.0 · 2026-09-28
No release notes were provided for this version.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Stolen Artwork/False Advertisement. Facebook ad had the wonderful art for the Bakery Dragon as the Ad for this game. Don't use other artists work to promote your unrelated game.
I changed my mind because now this game is false advertising. on Facebook it shows silent hill you click on it to play and it comes to this game.
not as advertised at all! not the same game or even simmilar to the advert. why bait and switch I'll just uninstall.
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
I don't normally write reviews, but I feel I should. I absolutely LOVE this game. The only reason I have given it 3 stars is purely because of how much energy it costs to finish the events. A lot of times, I haven't even been able to…
its too much. so much to do and near impossible to advance when dragon requirements for lightning scales are 140 and you can only get 7 every 3 hours. so energy goes too fast and you are stuck waiting or forced to buy some. i would rather…
"Spend money or perish" feels like the design philosophy here. By Level 12, story progression required hundreds of energy just to clear obstacles and unlock the next quest chain. With a slow-creeping energy cap, gameplay quickly becomes a…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.