Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 917 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 2.440.5752 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.440.5752, updated 2026-09-16.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2.440.5752 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.440.5752, updated 2026-09-11.
What the analysis found
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Nothing but ads — This is the most aggressively microtransactional game I’ve ever seen. I opened the game and tried to get one quest done and was hit with, seriously, at least 10 windows popping up trying to get me to buy a package or do…
Great Game! — If you’re looking for a great game to play and enjoy reading a great story line this is the game for you! Tons of events the characters are adorable, there’s not a ton of ads like every other game you’ve been playing, it’s…
Amazing — I download this because I saw tons of ads of it so I decided to download it and I’m addicted oh my gosh I can’t believe this game it’s super fun and fun and fun and fun I just want to hug this game thank you so much thank you…
Pay to progress
Love the game so far,progression is simple and not stuck behind some kind of pay wall nor is the full game, i wouldn't call this game "pay to win" either its very free to play friendly but paying for progression is an option via the…
They started using AI girls on their advertising ads on YouTube 🤣 wish I could give it a negative star, keep making the game more and more p2w on top of it too.
Pay to win. Don't waste your time
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 3 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.