Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 1,024 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.21.00 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.21.00, updated 2026-09-25.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.21.01 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.21.01, updated 2026-09-23.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
this is an awesome game. however.. there is to many ads. and then as if the programmed ads aren't enough, you are forced to watch ads to move on to the next level. because the help you can get is 900 coins a piece but you have to win 9 or…
many adds comes in this game . boring in add
The graphics are so hideous after the update... and that after every level played there's an ad 🤧
Pay to progress
I like the game. unfortunately its addicting but the rewards to continue are minimal and it becomes pay to pass. levels are so set that if its not perfect you don't win. pay to win.
Just another greedy app trap, fun to play until you get to levels which are impossible to beat without spending money. levels get harder, rewards get lamer. ad in between every level. play to level 100 then uninstall. stress creator.
pay to win. I was wondering when the algorithm made me pay for something. it was in level 9.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.