Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 425 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 3.0.3 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.0.3, updated 2026-09-23.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Amazing bones for a great game… but…❌Very heavily monetized with constant ads ❌Very unstable and constantly restarts the entire app If you leave the app for only a few seconds ❌Drains your battery fast and makes your phone hot, which can…
game contain adsware. ads pop up even when not playing the game. it self install pop up app and it can self install several other app without permission. my only mistake is i uninstall the pop up ads app and the game without recording…
too many ads
Pay to progress
pay to win obviously. AD's FORCE YOU TO THE PLAY STORE WITH NO WAY OF GETTING BACK TO THE GAME SO ABSOLUTELY NO REWARDS FOR WATCHING THE AD. NONE. THIS DEVELOPER IS TRASH
you either pay to win or you cheat. From what I've been told, the developers allow the cheating. That's how this game is now. Too bad, was decent. Not that it's that frustrating, I was offered ways to get free diamonds and other ways to…
good idea, play through and art. but full pay to win, free does not reach any of the S tier mech, and it is the same thing for all features, weapons, accessories, drone, pilot, all items has it's own pass to purchase. all events is the…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.