Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 915 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 5.4.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.4.1, updated 2026-09-08.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 5.4.0.2600 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.4.0.2600, updated 2026-09-24.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Update: rude customer service and of no help in refund. Filing with BBB and Consumer Reports at this point. Worst customer service and developers. Constant delays in results (up to hours/days later). Biggest complaint, everytime you get a…
The app takes time to get used to. It's not easy to find swimmers or teams; there's no consistency. Now that the season is finished and I want to CANCEL it seems impossible! It shouldn't be a struggle to cancel my monthly subscription…
Says I'm not subscribed, yet takes my payment out automatically. Trying to cancel my recurring subscription and the "manage your subscription" link brings be to the app store. Uninstalling won't cancel subscriptions; won't let me…
Price keeps rising
The price hike is NOT worth it, some events are missing A LOT are PENDING. I'm developing my own for half the price
Not very reliable and keep increasing in price
@ $20 per year per person the cost of it no longer justifies the app for the results. heat sheets, if loaded by the event coordinator are the also extra. with a mixed OS house hold of 4, this will run me $60 per year. Can no longer…
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
Every time I go to check results, it asks me to pay. I already have a subscription. The "fixes" don't work, and the three days later, it's back "on track," allowing access to results. It pretty much sucks when you want to follow your…
UPDATE 03/22 Yesterday after reinstall worked. Today back with same issue. What a joke. UPDATE 03/21 STILL ASKING FOR PAYMENT. even with subscription active. The support is useless. Keep telling you to uninstall and install again. Yet not…
my subscription is still valid until May 2025 but app keeps asking me to renew annual subscription with double price!!! Please check and explain. Thanks
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.