What’s the catch? Aggressive ad load — reported by 1,062 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 1.19.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.19.1, updated 2026-10-01.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Love game, please make ad free version — Absolutely my fav game to play, really makes the neurons happy. But the ads are excessive, I would pay to go ad free. Not only are they annoying but they burn through my phone battery :( please…
Hope you like pop-up ads — I enjoyed the game for the first few days, but eventually the bottom banner ads became pop-up ads that cover the whole screen without warning. Not worth the headache.
Ads and bots - super annoying!! — There’s an ad after EVERY SINGLE level/puzzle which is incredibly annoying AND there are fake users or bots playing, making you play more to get your spot back on the fake leaderboard! Limit the ads and…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
“This game has no ads” is a lie, and the notifications are crazy! — This hame is super fun!! But there’s adds😢and the it’s not notification me like crazy, I have 21 notifications from today!
Ads and bots - super annoying!! — There’s an ad after EVERY SINGLE level/puzzle which is incredibly annoying AND there are fake users or bots playing, making you play more to get your spot back on the fake leaderboard! Limit the ads and…
False advertising — If you see an ad for this game on another app these people are lying when they claim “no ads” this is a false claim as this game frequently has forces ads pop up. Shame shame shame on you for this false advertising…
States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
Great Game BUT… — Great game and does have potential but please offer a one-time fee to remove automatic ads
Love this game!!! — I absolutely love this game, I can’t wait for future updates and new ways to play. My only thing is I would actually like to pay a one time fee to remove the ads!! Sound mad but the ads can get annoying after a while…
Fun game, needs a remove ads option — Title says it all. Every time you do anything you get hit with an ad and it really kills my interest. And just to be clear when I say remove ads, I mean a one time payment. Subscriptions should be…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.