We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.13.03 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.13.03, updated 2026-01-14.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
👎 — Too many ads
Ads — This app is okay but is loaded with a ton of ads. The ads are super annoying and ruin the app . Please fix this immediately!
Cool but one problem — The Ads... It should look like one circule covers the other but the ad literally ruins the composure if the app...
Trial converts to a charge
You can not cancel the subscription — DON’T—After you start the free trial, you can’t get out of the trial, and it automatically charges $7.99 each week. Such a big ripoff. I’m complaining to Apple!
Unsubscribe — This app won’t let me unsubscribe and I do not want to pay for it! I’ve been trying to unsubscribe from the 7 day free trial which has been done for over a week now, so I’m sure I’ve been charged for this, but I do not use…
First review ever — You can’t even use it unless you pay 8 dollars a month and if you do the free trial you have to cancel or else it will charge you
Hard to cancel
Scammy Subscription — Manage subscription takes you to their legal notice section of a document on their site. Once you signup for the 3 day “trial” you can not unsubscribe from within the application. Should be removed from the App Store…
You can not cancel the subscription — DON’T—After you start the free trial, you can’t get out of the trial, and it automatically charges $7.99 each week. Such a big ripoff. I’m complaining to Apple!
Unsubscribe — This app won’t let me unsubscribe and I do not want to pay for it! I’ve been trying to unsubscribe from the 7 day free trial which has been done for over a week now, so I’m sure I’ve been charged for this, but I do not use…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 3 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.