We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.6.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.6.5, updated 2026-09-25.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
MUCH MONNNYYYY — It won’t let me do anything, everything is paid
Absolute Scam — Not only is this app completely locked behind a paywall, but they charged me immediately despite offering a free trial period in their own privacy agreement. The app didn’t let me change or cancel the subscription until I…
Hiding behind a paywall — This app was so good BEFORE they started hiding behind a stupid paywall, disappointing, developers always find a way to ruin a app
Paywall with no way past it
I hate it — I can’t even use the app without paying and I can’t make mixes anymore because you gold diggers want me to pay just for remixing songs bad review
Absolute Scam — Not only is this app completely locked behind a paywall, but they charged me immediately despite offering a free trial period in their own privacy agreement. The app didn’t let me change or cancel the subscription until I…
Not free — You literally cannot use this app without paying.Soon as you finish doing the little survey you’ll be slapped in the face with a subscription thing.Those who are looking to have some free fun, skip past this app.
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
Pay for everything — Won’t stop asking me to pay to just a make a mix
Premium — Every time I try to go in, it tells me to get premium
Aids inducing experience — One of those annoying “free” apps that doesn’t let you do anything without being bothered by their $100 paywall that lets you access basic features. Literally was not able to access the damn app without a prompt…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 3 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.