Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
SCAMMED ME OUT OF 29 DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!!!’ — Tried to do the free trial and got a charge for 29 dollars immediately after!!!!This needs fixed immediately. DON’T GET THIS APP!!!
Costs money after “free trial” — Expected a free app, got a “free trial” period instead and told me they would charge my card if I did not cancel before it was over… for a glorified tinder app for movies. What a joke, immediately…
Rip off — Have to pay $8 a week don’t download. Tried a free trial and charged me anyway, now I can’t figure out how to cancel the subscription.
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.