DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Mr Autofire
Lightheart Entertainment · Lifestyle

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 438 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources438 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-04
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 5.0.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.0.1, updated 2026-08-28.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 51 distinct reviewers (11.6% of 438 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (2.3% of 438 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Aggressive ad load

I rarely leave reviews but I want to point out one very honorable thing this game did, many games like this have lots of ads and even more ads if you wish to have better things that make the game more fun. This game has that, but they…

5★ · Google Play · 2026-06-13

I've been playing this game for years and I still do. the new content is never overwhelming, the controls are fluid, and there is very little forced ads which can be easily removed for a lower cost than most other mobile games. the…

5★ · Google Play · 2026-04-23

I’ve been playing this game for years, but the ads have become ridiculous. Watching an ad is fine, but forcing players to interact with and play the ad just to continue is unacceptable. If we don’t interact, the ad gets stuck for several…

3★ · Google Play · 2026-05-11

Pay to progress

Came back years later to see how things have change. Still pay to win, although the psychological attack by indicating everything with a dot, but almost all of them are ads to watch. I have at least 100hrs into the came from previous. I…

2★ · Google Play · 2026-06-07

100% pay to win (P2W). Fun at first and the potential for a fun game is there, but there is absolutely no way to obtain the better S rated weapons, armor and items without paying real money, with the higher items and rewards literally $39…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-02-02

deleted previous review to reflect recent update. Do not download this game if you intend to actually play the game. game freezes ans crashes after finishing basically any room. then as soon as you restart the game, youre slapped with an…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-04-06

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-04 Version analyzed: 5.0.13 independent signals438 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.