What’s the catch? Multiple ad networks bundled — measured, backed by SDKs in the app package.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
App Store
This analysis describes version 11.4.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 11.4.2, updated 2026-09-14.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 11.4.2a of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 11.4.2a, updated 2026-09-15.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 2
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Insane # of ads if you are free to play. I began paying 5$ a month for membership and my experience has been more enjoyable, simply because I am not being bombarded with ads every 30 seconds. gems have gotten easier to earn aswell, making…
so many ads, need to spend so many bits every time to play,
as much as i love the game itself, it's hard to ignore the constant ads and pay-to-win aspects of the game. everything costs tons of gems, which you have to grind for unless you have cash to spare, and random things like doing balloon pop…
Pay to progress
Game sucks Gameloft is incredibly greedy and heavily punishes free-to-play players with artificial paywalls. In the maze events an other events they deliberately set boss power levels just out of reach to force you to spend gems. To make…
This game is very pay to win heavy, and you can't save your progress, which I heavily dislike as I have downloaded and deleted this game many times throughout my life. My tablet basically broke and I have a lot of progress on there and…
love it, but how come a random pony, who doesnt have any tasks, was barely mentioned/wasnt even in the show and is an alternate of another pony, more expensive than the literal princess of the sun and ruler of equestria??? not to mention…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.