Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall blocks the basics
No longer usable for a pioneer — I understand why a developer might transition from a free to a paid app, but the current free version is too limited for practical use. After years of use, I’m switching to another app…
Sad No Longer Free — I really enjoyed using this app to track my field service time. Disappointed you now have to pay to continue recording your time.
Violates Apple policy — Per Apple developer guidelines: an App Store developer cannot offer a free app in exchange for a favorable review. This practice is a form of incentivized reviewing, which is strictly forbidden by Apple's App…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.