Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 629 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 1.21.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.21.5, updated 2026-09-22.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
I downloaded this because I wanted to play what you see in the pics (drinks on a bowling-kind of floor that become the next drink after two of the same touch; which is the ad that you can play a minute of) instead it forces you to play…
I don't understand why these types of games advertise themselves as one thing but the actual game is something completely different. the ad I got is showing drinks into one another, the actual game is just merging items. the only positive…
I love a merge game and downloaded this after seeing the ads for "unlimited energy" and no ads (most of the merge games don't have ads except when you want to watch one for more energy or an item in a bubble- and I prefer that so I don't…
Pay to progress
UPDATE: I am now uninstalling. I love this game but its so expensive, I'm offended. You start playing and 5 min later you're out of energy and have to spend money to keep playing. And the worst part is, they charge way too much for…
too costly once you start getting further in the game you have to spend money to get anywhere i found it was addictive and wasted alot on packs to be able to get one item, also whats the point of the gold coins you cant use them for…
Used to be my favourite merger now it just annoys and upsets me. - Game behaves like a Pay to win. - Orders are too difficult to get out. Rarely get even 1 order out with 100 energy. - Rewards are way too small. They never feel…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
I am addicted. You have the main game to play with a story board with a lot of side games to play. You need energy to play but if you run out you can play the side games. I only wish you can do something with your coins. I accumulated so…
UPDATE: I am now uninstalling. I love this game but its so expensive, I'm offended. You start playing and 5 min later you're out of energy and have to spend money to keep playing. And the worst part is, they charge way too much for…
This Game Is a Money Siphon. I feel this game is designed to drain money. Energy caps at 100 (1 per min), so full refill takes 1h40m. Higher levels require more merges but cap never increases, making progress slow. Paid items often don’t…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.