What’s the catch? Reports of unexpected charges — reported by 52 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 4.1.23 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.1.23, updated 2024-09-23.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports of unexpected charges
Total scam, stole my money — I paid to use the premium features and it charged my card but still said I had to buy premium to use the features, basically a scam to trick you into thinking you didn’t buy premium and purchase it again and…
NO REFUND, DOES NOT WORK — This app is absolutely horrible. I payed to use its VIP options, but it wouldn’t even let me use them. Not only that I cancelled my subscription, but they still kept on charging me. I have emailed them over a…
Doesn’t even work — You have to pay to get all the features on the app… i’ve done that & it still keeps saying i need to pay but they surely took my money TWICE and the app still acts as if i need to upgrade to use the features SMH
Paywall blocks the basics
paywalled — ive had this app since 2021 and have always been able to check my unfollowers with no problem. now, every single feature is stuck behind a paywall. it’s very shameless and greedy to completely paywall features that were free…
Useless — You have to pay for anything you do on the app
Used to have some free functions — Some functions were free but now you have to pay for everything, it’s absolutely useless. Uninstalling the app and unlinking my account and changing the password so they have zero access to my IG anymore.
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
Does not Work — Do not get this app. I pay and it never works - always tells me I need to upgrade to pro but when I click "restore" it will tell me I'm already upgraded. This is a scam and needs to be taken down.
DONT GET THIS HORRIBLE APP — First off you have to pay for everything, I gave it a try and got the 29.99/year after I paid it still kept asking me to pay to see everything. I refreshed the app and it still did not let me see anything so…
Waste of money — They make you pay to unlock the other features and when you pay it keeps asking you to pay again
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.