Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 1,001 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 11.2.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 11.2.0, updated 2026-09-11.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.9.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.9.2, updated 2026-09-29.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 5
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
Bait & Switch The "Free trial" is only available if you agree to be charged for a full year as soon as those 7 days end? And, as far as I can tell, there is absolutely no content available to try so you can determine if you want to take…
They claim to be similar to Duolingo for learning, but the experience is quite different. They make you spend around 10 minutes filling out a detailed form and collecting a lot of information from you. After that, they require you to…
Signed up for a Free trial...Free trial was a lie, instantly charged me over $40 and now tells me I have to go through Google play to request refund. This app is a joke anyways and not what is advertised, it was basically the same…
Hard to cancel
I uninstall the app on my phone because I wasn't using it. And then I've been charged for it more than once. I can't even find a way to uninstall it. So I had to dispute the charge with PayPal and I've sent them an email we'll see if it…
not what it's advertised to be and hard to unsubscribe. EDIT: I was charged once again since writing this review. This company knowingly scams people, don't fall for it like many of the people leaving reviews have!
Poor service — I canceled the subscription and keep getting charged. When I try to get customer service it continues to send me to the website where it wants me to sign up for the service again. I don’t want the service. I found the…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
bait and switch
Signed up for a Free trial...Free trial was a lie, instantly charged me over $40 and now tells me I have to go through Google play to request refund. This app is a joke anyways and not what is advertised, it was basically the same…
As always after getting information about you, surprise, surprise an abo model app. I despise non clearly marked apps designed to pay. Also: your ads are misleading... Great the developer "is sorry" and this means absolutely nothing....
Paywall blocks the basics
Asks a ton of questions just to lock everything behind a paywall. Waste of my time.
Can't do anything without paying. don't bother downloading.
You can't do anything without paying. it seems like a good app tho, with lots of information and fun ways to learn.
Reports of unexpected charges
Absolute scam trap! Avoid at all costs. They trap you by making you fill out long forms for 10 minutes, then trick you into what looks like a "trial plan" mandate setup, only to immediately deduct the full annual payment of ₹4,050 right…
I paid for the 11.99 subscription and I was charged 42 dollars. please give me a refund as I do not have 42 dollars to waste. edit: this is genuinely the worst customer service i have experienced. my subscription has been cancelled for…
Do NOT buy the subscription. I tried the free trial then quickly realized there was nothing to this app. I unsubscribed and STILL got charged. I've been trying to unsubscribe for months and it keeps charging me 30$ every month. Edit: I…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.