Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 438 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 1.4.60 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.4.60, updated 2026-09-02.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
the ads are fake... you will NEVER have the experience flying your own ship... it is one of those city builders where the f2p player will NEVER catch up to a casher... ads show you piloting ships... that will NEVER happen... they will…
fake ads, not a real fps starship shooter. the dev will write below "oh, you must have seen an ad on a specific event that is not always available" and I would replay " right, so fake ad, because that's not what the game is about"
Very bad, also fake ads in socials
Pay to progress
This game is genuinely so fun, I definitely want to see more in the future. There's 0 ads, little to none P2W, and has a great gameplay loop! My only complaint? Chatting is pretty buggy, but who needs chat when your blasting dreadnoughts!…
Very P2W, especially as you progress into the game. The game runs on a cycle of events that become repetitive and boring after 2 cycles. All other events like seasonal one are all about getting you to spend more money... I don't mind…
update. i decided to try this trash again. My original statement years ago reign true still. Never down loading this trash again. 2022 review ->Overall I must say the game is horrible and continues down that path. Turned completely p2w…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.