Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 501 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 9.11.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 9.11.0, updated 2026-04-23.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports of unexpected charges
Having same issue as everyone else. I've been subscribed to NTTV for a long time. When the update happened, it was trying to make me resubscribe. They've been taking my money for the last two months and I still have yet to be able to…
Ok so I purchased gold yesterday was charged twice and now it's saying I have to pay to watch content but when I go to subscriptions it says I have gold and when I click the x it ask am I sure I want to cancel smh
Charging me extra after the upgrade. I couldn't log in, and when I tried, it made me buy a bundle. I upgraded to Silver, and I'm still being charged 5.99 and 7.99 and can't access either one. I want my money back. I sent an email, and…
Hard to cancel
Ever since that stupid update the app has been straight trash!!! But they charged me every month for this app but I can't watch anything on it.... I can't unsubscribe can't talk to nobody I have sent emails no reply I'm over it it ain't…
Experience was all good until they changed it to Plus. Now I can't get into my account. So now they are taking money out my account and I can't cancel it. They keep telling me that my email does not exist. All I want to do is cancel so I…
The fact that you all make it so hard to unsubscribe literally feels like a scam. I've had the app and been paying for a subscription I don't use for months now. ridiculous
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
I paid the price and it keeps asking me to pay again when I try to watch it on the TV. there is also no phone number to contact anyone about this issue.
This app sucks! Just like almost everyone else, it won't let you watch shows, keeps telling you to subscribe when you already are! This app is 💩. I wonder who the owners are. This is a scam app!
Dude this whole update is a fkn mess🙄 Like I have been a subscriber since day 1. Had a issue with this update and had to re- subscribe and these mfks done took my damn money but aren't allowing me in the app, keeps asking me to pay…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.