We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 5.2.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.2.6, updated 2026-07-18.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
환 불 해 주 세 요 Refund!!! — 한달 무료체험이라고 했고 결제 후 한달내로 취소 가능하다고 했는데 한달무료체험이 아니었어요. 일년치를 그냥 계산해버렀더라구요? 너무 별로여서 한시간 뒤에 취소하려했더니 환불 안된대요. 저 너무 화나는데 환불해주세요. 이 앱 여러분 다운받지 마세요. 최악중에 최악입니다. 이정도면 사기 아닌가요? The app mentioned the offer of a one-month free…
💀bro — So I downloaded this and I did the seven day free trial and when I want to erase something it stopped at 99% and everything freeze so I canceled the seven day free trial and got rid of it but it says the seven day free trial…
Scam!! Fraud!!! — They said there was a free trial but charged me even more than it even initially said it would.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Not free — Advertised as free, don't have to pay to download, but you have to pay to do anything else besides download it. Complete waste of time and not worth the insane amount they want you to pay
Scam — I’m extremely unhappy with this app. It’s probably the worst photoshop app I’ve ever used. I just wanted to try it to see if it worked, and, first off, it sucked. Second, you tried to charge me for a 1 year subscription even after…
False advertising — It’s says 2.99 a week I said sure I’ll try it out, boom Apple charges me $10 for the subscription
Paywall blocks the basics
Scam — Don’t waster your time is not free as they say you need to pay to pretty much use everything & the tools that they offer are not worth a subscription so yes don’t waste your time.
not free — you need to pay for literally everything
WHY — Why do o have to pay for everything on this
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.