Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 450 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 2.61.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.61.1, updated 2026-09-23.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Where is the 3x 999 summons like you said in the ads? Fake ads? Game is great, its like darkest dungeons. 1 star because of the misleading and false ads. Update: I played the game long about a day and found out that the 3x 999 free sums…
False advertisement. I was promised 1000 summons and a billion diamonds. I got 40 summons and no diamonds. Dishonest devs get one star from me.
Do you guys realize that this app is rated TEEN? It's advertised as 17+ and 18+ but it's rated teen meaning minors could probably play this app.
Pay to progress
The game is heavily P2W. There are like 50 different packs and upgrades whales can buy, giving them 50× more resources than F2P players. As a F2P player, you'll constantly run into whales at a similar level to yours who are twice as…
Another gacha app (so not an actual videogame with a gameplay requiring skill), just a clicking app making you wait for the slot machine to give you the resources you need, with option to buy your odds. Same issues of balance between…
Super P2W and greedy gatcha. I was hoping for improvements in 2026. Instead all existing characters were nerfed to C tier forcing you to buy all new characters. Story goes downhill after the first chapter. The voice over acting and fancy…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.