We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 26.37.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 26.37.0, updated 2026-09-22.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 5
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
Scam — Canceled my free trial and still got charged
Scam — They let you sign up for a free trial, but there is NO WAY to cancel it before they charge you the full price. It won’t even show up on your subscriptions on App Store
Not efficient — Not good for local trails wasn’t what I expected and it charged me for the monthly subscription when I only wanted the free trial terrible experience.
Hard to cancel
Great app, just expensive — This app is amazing, I had a free trial I used on my trip to Utah. The only issue I have is price. My family does quite a bit of off-roading throughout the year, but not on a weekly basis like some people…
Cant cancel — For you to just cancel your subscription you gotta download a whole different app. Tried calling to cancel and I thought I did got charged anyway. Quite frustrated and disappointed. App itself does work good though
Scam — They let you sign up for a free trial, but there is NO WAY to cancel it before they charge you the full price. It won’t even show up on your subscriptions on App Store
Paywall blocks the basics
Unusable with incessant “upgrade now” popup — Literally every 3 seconds I’m in the app, I have to close yet another “upgrade now” popup. Free version of the app is completely unusable. I was thinking about upgrading but this is so…
They make you pay for safety!! — I was hoping to use this app to track some wildfires that are actively in progress in my area as onX was the first app to pop up when I was trying to find this information. But onX has decided to lock this…
Paywall — You have to pay for anything worthwhile on this app. Lame. Let’s stop gatekeeping 😬
Aggressive ad load
Awesome! — New to off roading and especially here in Texas I’m able to find off roading parks and trails that don’t get a lot of advertising. Texas makes you work for it!
Obtrusive pop-up ads — Can’t look at the map without constant pop-up ads trying to sell you a subscription.
Constant ads even when paid — This app does not offer anything special outside of giving you access to trail reviews from other drivers, which tend to not be very informative and mostly consist of pictures of their car Pop-up adds every…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Not what it advertised — I saw this app on instagram, and it said you could use it to find camping spots for free. That information does not seem to be readily available. Waste of time.
Rude and un-navigable — Impossible to access the app without tapping through 10 minutes of screen prompts that are practically ads. Then it demands you to sign up for its subscription or it’s a dead app. Hate false advertising, and being…
PAID SUBSCRIPTION REQUIRED FOR MAP USE — Saw an instagram ad and it advertised as free map for camping and trialing but once you answer the 100 questions they have placed out for you it the app forces you to enter a card so you can do the…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.