Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Surprise charges
Poor user experience — This is admittedly in part user error, but I am not a fan of having to manually end the sessions. ParkMobile’s pre payment makes way more sense. As a first time user, I hurriedly had to download the app to park…
Terrible design — Beware, you have to “stop” your session or the keeps charging you unlike ParkMobile. Hope I never have to use this terrible UI/UX design again.
pango parking…. 👎👎 — Terrible app that glitches a lot, and took my money.. I parked and paid for 2-3 hours max I stopped the timer and the next morning I was notified that I got charged a full 24 hours and 34.80$ I DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.