We scanned 903 user reviews and found no recurring complaint patterns. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
No ad complaints
It's fun, and it's the cheapest one. but one problem is the other ones are more expensive than this one. but it's fine, and another thing is this game has no ads, which I like. and the HD ones are the most expensive their 2.99$. which…
Wonderful time-passer with no ads or microtransactions. It does get a little repetitive but overall it's a classic and fun little game to have in your pocket.
I love this game, It's given me tons of nostalgia and I get to relive my childhood, I also love how you can play it offline and there's no ads, great game. I know because it's ¢99 so ads aren't put on but I've bought a few games before…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.