Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Surprise charges
Easy to Bypass, Terrible Support, and Charges After Cancellation — Very disappointed with this app. My child could easily unlock all the settings, making the parental controls ineffective. It also doesn’t work without Wi-Fi or mobile…
Awful — I accidentally bought the year subscription and they won’t refund me the amount. I was going to give it a try for free but won’t be now with such a disgraceful customer service. I’m unemployed and $90 to pay to not use an app is…
Incredibly glitchy and misleading. — I wanted to love this app but it glitches too often and it doesn’t do nearly as much as that AI video ad they had for it said it would do. Any time I try to do anything it glitches leaving my children…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.