DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
ParkMobile: Park. Pay. Go.
Parkmobile, LLC · Lifestyle

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 480 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: High3 signal sources480 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-04
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 26.36.3 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 26.38.3, updated 2026-10-02.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 26.36.3, not the version now listed on the store.

Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:

Version 26.38.3 · 2026-10-02

No release notes were provided for this version.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Tracking and data collection concerns
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
What we saw: Data & privacy concerns: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (1.0% of 480 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Hard to cancel: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.5% of 480 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Tracking and data collection concerns

garbage. they sell your information to scammers and call lists, anyone who will pay.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-02

Data breach settlement of an insulting $1, paid only with continued use of the app, over 4 sessions paid $0.25 at a time, and its use requires you to intentionally apply it as its buried in the payment menu under discounts. Basically not…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-04-10

Low quality app - do not load! Pay cash at a kiosk. (1) App wants you to pay an excessive monthly fee - don't do it (2) app sells your email to an outside marketing company to buy your loyalty - protect your privacy (3) like Flock cameras…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-31

Hard to cancel

What a scam! Don't make a mistake or you'll pay for it! Could not be less user friendly. Arrived at our destination, accidentally registered the incorrect vehicle, my mom's that was saved in the app, and the vehicle we were using, at the…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-22

can't cancel a parking session. was in a rental and the app had the previous license se plate in. At check out couldn't change license plate so had to literally pay twice. should be able to cancel and not forced to by twice

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-28

200 miles from home, session was about to expire in a garage known for towing vehicles. I go to start a new session, realize the app started it for my vehicle back home. Apparently it's the "default" vehicle which is the stupidest feature…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-17

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-04 Version analyzed: 26.36.33 independent signals480 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.