What’s the catch? Reports of unexpected charges — reported by 31 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 26.40.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 26.40.0, updated 2026-10-05.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports of unexpected charges
Scam, No Payment Options — This app stopped letting me add a credit card, instead it wants me to add credit to my wallet. What is going on here
Disaster in terms of policy — App good but I parked in ni beach and accidentally selected wrong plate form old car . no way to cancel or change active session no refund ! While I was figuring things out and stepped away 50 feet I got…
Can’t verify license plate — App doesn’t let you verify the correct license plate before taking your money and then you can’t modify the plate number after booking. Absolutely terrible.
Hard to cancel
Handy but has some limits — This app is handy, but has some limits. You cannot cancel or modify a session. Extending is pretty easy. In the DC area, many listed stops are not there or replaced with something else. I would be very…
Disaster in terms of policy — App good but I parked in ni beach and accidentally selected wrong plate form old car . no way to cancel or change active session no refund ! While I was figuring things out and stepped away 50 feet I got…
No mistakes allowed — Man do not do something like choose the wrong vehicle. No way to change plates, no way to cancel or change anything, nothing to do but just literally pay again. AI help agent is dumb as a sack of rocks and no human…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.