Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 410 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 3.10.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.10.0, updated 2026-09-25.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False advertisement said you will take out .23 cents to try out and after a month $6 I go to account you have already taken $6 and when I tried to cancel it won't allow me and added $9 so now $6 plus the $9 will come out of account…
false advertising app says try. downloaded app and there is no coins given to try app before purchase hence 1 star currently no free try than it false advertising when it's say try it means you get some trial coins
Not good at all. I have done 2 projects and each time the 2 people are in the wrong place. The living one is coming out of the sky to meet the dead one Tried again hanging the order of the photos and still the living one is walking down…
Reports of unexpected charges
This app. keeps charging my credit card when I have never purchased anything. You can't even unsubscribe with them. I have denied the charges with my card company, reissued a different card number, and emailed them. They keep trying to…
was told 3 months ago that my subscription was cancelled. this month and the previous month I am still being charged $35 per month. I was told by one of their people that because I called the next day after I purchased the app he would…
I had tried this app which I do not like i probably would have given it a 3 stars, maybe 4 until I dealt with their customer service. I canceled my subscription in the app. Well apparently it didn't work whatever. So they say, and they…
Hard to cancel
This app takes your money and runs - there is no clear way to cancel your subscription once you've even started a short trial.. be warned! It suggests it will send you a link to your account but it does not. This means you can't cancel…
False advertisement said you will take out .23 cents to try out and after a month $6 I go to account you have already taken $6 and when I tried to cancel it won't allow me and added $9 so now $6 plus the $9 will come out of account…
Good app but not a convenient way to cancel the auto-renewal of the subscription... I have tried to cancel the auto-renewal several times but every time I log in it shows that it is still active... why do you do it?
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.